How It Works
Your FL3 strategic work system creates flight items that need specialized, focused work. Instead of going through a coordination layer, these items go directly to the FL1 team that owns that expertise.
Example: "Evaluate outsourcing our cloud infrastructure to Provider X" (strategic question)
- Doesn't need coordination between teams
- Goes directly to the Infrastructure & Operations team
- That team evaluates, researches, and delivers the answer back to FL3
Another example: "Research compliance requirements for GDPR 3.0" (strategic work)
- Only the Legal/Compliance team needs to handle this
- Direct from FL3 to that FL1 team
- No benefit from coordinating with product, ops, or other areas
Key dynamic: The strategic work is specialized enough that it doesn't intersect with other coordination areas. It's pure expertise work.
Typical Use
Use this pattern when:
- You have specialized support functions that work on strategic initiatives
- Strategic work doesn't require cross-team coordination
- The work is expertise-driven rather than integration-driven
- You want to reduce unnecessary coordination overhead
Real-world examples:
- Legal team evaluating strategic contracts or regulations
- Security team handling strategic security initiatives
- Finance team evaluating strategic acquisitions or investments
- HR team developing strategic talent/culture initiatives
Key Characteristics
- FL3 Strategic Work System: Creates flight items for specialized work
- FL1 Specialist Team: Receives items directly; executes specialized work without coordination
- No FL2 layer: Coordination not needed for this type of work
- Autonomy: High for the specialist team; their work isn't blocked by other teams
- Coordination: Minimal—mainly reporting results back to FL3
- Size: Works at any size; typical for support/specialist functions
When to Combine
This pattern coexists with others: Common Strategy for product teams, Direct Strategy for specialist teams teams.